Prime factorizations #
n.factorization
is the finitely supported function ℕ →₀ ℕ
mapping each prime factor of n
to its multiplicity in n
. For example, since 2000 = 2^4 * 5^3,
factorization 2000 2
is 4factorization 2000 5
is 3factorization 2000 k
is 0 for all otherk : ℕ
.
TODO #
As discussed in this Zulip thread: https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/217875/topic/Multiplicity.20in.20the.20naturals We have lots of disparate ways of talking about the multiplicity of a prime in a natural number, including
factors.count
,padicValNat
,multiplicity
, and the material inData/PNat/Factors
. Move some of this material to this file, prove results about the relationships between these definitions, and (where appropriate) choose a uniform canonical way of expressing these ideas.Moreover, the results here should be generalised to an arbitrary unique factorization monoid with a normalization function, and then deduplicated. The basics of this have been started in
RingTheory/UniqueFactorizationDomain
.Extend the inductions to any
NormalizationMonoid
with unique factorization.
n.factorization
is the finitely supported function ℕ →₀ ℕ
mapping each prime factor of n
to its multiplicity in n
.
Equations
- n.factorization = { support := n.primeFactors, toFun := fun (p : ℕ) => if Nat.Prime p then padicValNat p n else 0, mem_support_toFun := ⋯ }
Instances For
The support of n.factorization
is exactly n.primeFactors
.
We can write both n.factorization p
and n.factors.count p
to represent the power
of p
in the factorization of n
: we declare the former to be the simp-normal form.
Alias of Nat.primeFactorsList_count_eq
.
We can write both n.factorization p
and n.factors.count p
to represent the power
of p
in the factorization of n
: we declare the former to be the simp-normal form.
Basic facts about factorization #
Every nonzero natural number has a unique prime factorization
Lemmas characterising when n.factorization p = 0
#
Lemmas about factorizations of products and powers #
For any p : ℕ
and any function g : α → ℕ
that's non-zero on S : Finset α
,
the power of p
in S.prod g
equals the sum over x ∈ S
of the powers of p
in g x
.
Generalises factorization_mul
, which is the special case where S.card = 2
and g = id
.
Lemmas about factorizations of primes and prime powers #
The only prime factor of prime p
is p
itself, with multiplicity 1
For prime p
the only prime factor of p^k
is p
with multiplicity k
Equivalence between ℕ+
and ℕ →₀ ℕ
with support in the primes. #
Factorization and coprimes #
Generalisation of the "even part" and "odd part" of a natural number #
We introduce the notations ord_proj[p] n
for the largest power of the prime p
that
divides n
and ord_compl[p] n
for the complementary part. The ord
naming comes from
the $p$-adic order/valuation of a number, and proj
and compl
are for the projection and
complementary projection. The term n.factorization p
is the $p$-adic order itself.
For example, ord_proj[2] n
is the even part of n
and ord_compl[2] n
is the odd part.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Factorization LCM definitions #
If a = ∏ pᵢ ^ nᵢ
and b = ∏ pᵢ ^ mᵢ
, then factorizationLCMLeft = ∏ pᵢ ^ kᵢ
, where
kᵢ = nᵢ
if mᵢ ≤ nᵢ
and 0
otherwise. Note that the product is over the divisors of lcm a b
,
so if one of a
or b
is 0
then the result is 1
.
Equations
Instances For
If a = ∏ pᵢ ^ nᵢ
and b = ∏ pᵢ ^ mᵢ
, then factorizationLCMRight = ∏ pᵢ ^ kᵢ
, where
kᵢ = mᵢ
if nᵢ < mᵢ
and 0
otherwise. Note that the product is over the divisors of lcm a b
,
so if one of a
or b
is 0
then the result is 1
.
Note that factorizationLCMRight a b
is not factorizationLCMLeft b a
: the difference is
that in factorizationLCMLeft a b
there are the primes whose exponent in a
is bigger or equal
than the exponent in b
, while in factorizationLCMRight a b
there are the primes whose
exponent in b
is strictly bigger than in a
. For example factorizationLCMLeft 2 2 = 2
, but
factorizationLCMRight 2 2 = 1
.